<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIP Mark-to-Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dougist.com/2009/04/rip-mark-to-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dougist.com/2009/04/rip-mark-to-market/</link>
	<description>Douglas Barone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 03:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://dougist.com/2009/04/rip-mark-to-market/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougist.com/?p=217#comment-330</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Before you all flame me, Yes I know that MtM was modified by FASB, an independent standards group. But (again you will not see this in the Times) you’ll find that independent boards are remarkably malleable, especially under international negotiations of their host nations. And I also know that MtM modification was some time in coming. All items that come out of meetings like the G-20 have footprints. No one in the Financial Services Industry thought MtM was a good idea (except,the accounting consultants who billed extra time to implement it) and lobbying for it’s repeal has been going on for years.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Doug&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you all flame me, Yes I know that MtM was modified by FASB, an independent standards group. But (again you will not see this in the Times) you’ll find that independent boards are remarkably malleable, especially under international negotiations of their host nations. And I also know that MtM modification was some time in coming. All items that come out of meetings like the G-20 have footprints. No one in the Financial Services Industry thought MtM was a good idea (except,the accounting consultants who billed extra time to implement it) and lobbying for it’s repeal has been going on for years.</p>

<p>Doug</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

